Supporting such claims, physician and sexologist Anne Lawrence, in a paper presented at the XVII Harry Benjamin International Symposium on Gender Dysphoria, stated that there is little scientific evidence that a one-year RLE is necessary or sufficient for favorable outcomes following GRS.In addition, she presented the results of a study she conducted on a group of trans women in which she showed that GRS without a prior one-year RLE could be undergone without the subsequent expression of regret.In addition, WPATH emphasizes that the SOC are merely clinical guidelines, and are intended to be both flexible and modifiable to meet the circumstances of the patient and the preferences and judgement of the clinician.Clinical practice in many places may be more or less stringent.Un gran laberinto cuyas salidas se abren y rematan en el oceano.Ukrainian ladies dating free for a future husband in internet.
There is actually a lot to consider when looking towards a surgical option for yourself.
She concluded that her results did not support the SOC requirement of a one-year RLE as an absolute requirement for GRS.
Further in support of the idea that a one-year RLE requirement prior to GRS is unnecessary is the fact that regrets, as well as suicide, are very rare in post-operative transgender people in general.
They also state that documentation of a name and/or gender marker change can be presented as a way of providing proof that the RLE has been completed, but do not state that a name and/or gender marker change is a necessary requirement for completion of the RLE.
The SOC are followed by most medical professionals who specialize in the care of transgender individuals, and are the most widely followed clinical guidelines for the treatment of transgender persons in use.